Dad Khan vs The State and another
The petitioner, Dad Khan, filed a petition seeking post-arrest bail in a case registered under the Customs Act, 1969, involving allegations of smuggling, obstructing customs officials, and causing injuries to a Customs Intelligence Officer during an interception of a container. The core legal question was whether the petitioner was entitled to post-arrest bail despite the offences not falling within the prohibitory clause of Section 497 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898. The Lahore High Court held that while bail is generally the rule in non-prohibitory offences, exceptional circumstances exist in this case. The Court found that the petitioner was caught red-handed, armed with a firearm, and involved in a violent assault on government officials, with recovery of the crime weapon and evidence of injuries to the complainant. Consequently, the Court dismissed the bail petition, ruling that the petitioner's aggressive and desperate conduct disentitled him to the relief of bail. The Court further directed the investigation agency to expedite the submission of the report under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, to ensure a swift trial.
- Does the fact that an offence does not fall within the prohibitory clause of Section 497 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898 automatically entitle an accused to bail?
- Can an accused be denied post-arrest bail in a non-prohibitory offence if there is prima facie evidence of violent conduct and recovery of weapons?
- What is the duty of the investigation agency regarding the submission of a report under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898 when a bail petition is dismissed?
- Section 2(s), Customs Act 1969
- Section 16, Customs Act 1969
- Section 156(1), Customs Act 1969
- Section 157, Customs Act 1969
- Section 187, Customs Act 1969
- Section 497, Code of Criminal Procedure 1898
- Section 173, Code of Criminal Procedure 1898
ORDER
SYED SHAHBAZ ALI RIZVI, J.---Dad Khan, petitioner seeks post arrest bail in case F.I.R. No.160 dated 07.06.2021, registered for offence under Sections 2(s) and 16 punishable under Sections 156(1) (77) (85), (89), (92), 157 and 187 of Customs Act, 1969 read with SRO 5(1)/2021 dated 04.01.2021, at Police Station I&P Branch, Customs Collectorate (E&C) Customs, Lahore.
2. Allegation against the petitioner , in brief, is that when the trailer loaded with container of smuggled goods was signaled to stop, he along with co-accused while armed with their respective weapons came at the spot, attacked the customs staff, started firing to snatch the container of smuggled goods and during the scuffle injured Gulzar Hussain Bhatti, Intelligence Customs Of ficer.
3. Heard. Record perused.
4. Though the offences punishable under the Customs Act, 1969 applied against the present petitioner do not fall within the prohibitory clause of Section 497, Cr.P.C., and in such like cases, grant of bail is a rule yet there are exceptional circumstances available in this case as according to the prosecution story narrated in the crime report when the trailer bearing registration No.TLH-506 was intercepted by the raiding party led by Rana Gulzar Hussain Bhatti, Customs Intelligence Officer, the petitioner along with four co-accused persons intervened to deter and obstruct the officials from performance of their official duty and started beating them. The petitioner as well as his co-accused being armed with firearms also shot repeated straight fires. Multiple blunt weapon injuries during the occurrence were caused to the head of raiding party . When the Medical Officer examined him, his clothes were torn which is evident from the perusal of his medico legal examination certificate. The petitioner was caught red-handed in injured condition by the authorities with in time help of other teams of Customs Department. Mobile phone of the injured officer was also snatched. Pistol, crime weapon and empties of bullets shot by the petitioner were taken into possession there and then which prima facie establishes the allegation of assault by the petitioner upon the Government officials and connects the petitioner with the alleged offences. Such violent, aggressive and desperate purported conduct of the petitioner in the circumstances, disentitles him to the, grant of post arrest bail. No mala fide on the part of the complainant, the recovery witnesses and the injured Customs Intelligence Officer against the petitioner could be surfaced during the arguments. Hence this petition is dismissed. However , keeping in view the abovementioned circumstances of this case the investigation agency is directed to submit report under Section 173, Cr.P.C., against the petitioner immediately without wasting any more time if not already done and after submission of the same to the learned trial court it shall be proceeded with swiftly for expeditious conclusion of the trial in the shortest possible time. Earliest submission of complete or interim challan to the learned court shall be reported to the Director . Customs concerned.