Nakhuda Mustafa and another vs The State and another
This petition arose from the conviction of the petitioners under the Balochistan Sea Fisheries Ordinance 1971 for illegal fishing inside internal waters using a prohibited net. The trial court convicted the petitioners, sentenced them to rigorous imprisonment, and ordered the confiscation and auction of their fishing craft. The High Court of Balochistan subsequently reduced the sentence of imprisonment to the period already undergone and set aside the fine, but maintained the confiscation. The petitioners approached the Supreme Court of Pakistan primarily seeking the release of the confiscated fishing craft, arguing that the prosecution failed to prove the charge and that the confiscation was harsh as the craft was their sole source of sustenance. The Supreme Court held that the prosecution had established the petitioners' guilt beyond reasonable doubt through positive evidence and scientific proof. The Court further ruled that the proviso to Section 9 of the Balochistan Sea Fisheries Ordinance 1971 mandatorily requires the auction of the fishing craft in the event of a contravention. Consequently, the petition was dismissed and leave was declined.
- Whether the auction of a fishing craft used in contravention of the Balochistan Sea Fisheries Ordinance 1971 is mandatory upon conviction under Section 9 of the Ordinance?
- Can a court waive the confiscation and auction of a fishing vessel on the ground of it being the sole source of sustenance for the convicts if the statutory provision mandatorily requires its auction?
- Section 9, Balochistan Sea Fisheries Ordinance 1971
ORDER
QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED, J.---The petitioners were intercepted by the Fisheries Department of Government of Balochistan while fishing inside internal waters in contravention of the provisions of the Balochistan Sea Fisheries Ordinance, 1971 (Baln Ord. IX of 1971 ) on 14.12.2018; all on board, 21 in number , were taken into custody; fishing craft, named as Al-Faisal-II along with prohibited net was secured vide inventory of even date; indicted before a learned Judicial Magistrate at Gawadar , they were convicted under section 9 of the Ordinance ibid; the petitioners were sentenced to 9-months' R.I. whereas the remainders were sentenced to 28-days, served out without challenge, vide judgment dated 10.01.2019. The confiscated fishing craft was directed to be auctioned.
The learned Sessions Judge Gawadar , in appeal vide judgment dated 23.1.2019 maintained the conviction, however , the High Court of Balochistan vide judgment dated 22.02.2019 set aside the fine and also reduced the sentence of imprisonment to the period already undergone by the convicts. Against the above backdrop, the petitioners primarily seek release of the fishing craft, confiscated by the learned trial Magistrate for auction, a course affirmed by the Court of Session as well as the High Court of Balochistan on the ground that the impugned action being harsh merits recall, particularly its being the sole source of sustenance for the petitioners. Mr. Tahir Ali Baloch, ASC, vehemently argued that there was no occasion for the learned Magistrate to return a guilty verdict, as according to him, the prosecution had miserably failed to drive home the charge beyond reasonable doubt, an error that escaped notice of learned Sessions Judge as well as the learned Judge-in-Chamber and as such while the days of incarceration endured by the convicts cannot be recompensed, release of the fishing craft would, nonetheless, indemnify the wrong.
2. Heard. Record perused.
3. We have gone through the record. The petitioners were intercepted while using a banned net within the internal waters. The location is unambiguously established with map Ex.P/3-B. The prohibited net being used for fishing was secured by the raiding party and all those on board were arrested, leaving no space to entertain any hypothesis other than their guilt. Three courts meticulously appraised the evidence to discard bald denial pleaded by the petitioners in the face of positive evidence, supported by scientific proof. In the matter of sentence, the convicts were dealt with leniently . Proviso to section 9 of the Ordinance ibid, in the event of contravention, mandatorily provides auction of fishing craft, thus, the impugned direction by the learned Magistrate, upheld in appeal by the Court of Session as well as the learned Judge-in-Chamber being within the remit of law calls for no interference. Petition fails. Leave declined.