Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Interior vs Imran Ahmed Khan Niazi
This matter arises from contempt proceedings initiated against the respondent and his counsel for the alleged breach of solemn undertakings given to the Supreme Court regarding the peaceful conduct of a political rally in Islamabad without causing public inconvenience or blocking highways. The core legal question concerns the prima facie liability of the respondent and his counsel for violating court undertakings under the Contempt of Court Ordinance, 2003. The Court held that before proceeding further, the factual aspects of the alleged breach must be ascertained at a prima facie level, particularly regarding the role of an absent party, and directed the office to serve the investigative reports and related applications upon the respondents to submit their written replies. The key principle laid down is that notice and an opportunity to respond based on verified material must be afforded to alleged contemnors to ascertain prima facie liability for the breach of court undertakings before initiating formal contempt proceedings.
- Whether breach of an undertaking given to the court for holding a political rally attracts proceedings under the Contempt of Court Ordinance, 2003?
- Can contempt proceedings be initiated against a party for the violation of court undertakings without first ascertaining their prima facie role and liability?
- Whether an application for interim relief under Article 187 of the Constitution is maintainable in the context of contempt proceedings?
- Section 3, Contempt of Court Ordinance 2003
- Section 2(a), Contempt of Court Ordinance 2003
- Article 187, Constitution of Pakistan 1973
ORDER
The learned Additional Attorney General for Pakistan has referred to the contents of our order dated 25.05.2022 (afternoon) and our judgment dated 26.05.2022 passed in Constitution Petition No.19 of 2022. From the contents of the said order, he has pointed out that the following undertakings were given by Dr. Babar Awan, learned Sr. ASC and Mr. Faisal Fareed, learned ASC on behalf of the Respondent, Mr. Imran Khan, Chairman, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf ("PTI") for holding PTI's rally in the ground situated between Sectors H-9 and G-9, Islamabad: i. The rally will not cause any inconvenience at or blockage of Srinagar Highway; ii. No inconvenience will be caused to the public and citizenry at large; and iii. The rally will be conducted in a peaceful and lawful manner without damaging any public or private property.
He has then read to us material from the reports filed by the Islamabad Capital Territory ("ICT"), Intelligence Bureau ("IB") and Inter-Services Intelligence ("ISI") in answer to the questions posed in paragraph-7 of our judgment dated 26.05.2022. After reading extracts from the said reports, the learned Additional Attorney General has submitted that the persons who gave the undertakings as well as the person on whose behalf the said undertakings were given breached the same attracting the offence specified in Section 3 read with Section 2(a) of the Contempt of Court Ordinance, 2003 ("Ordinance"). He has accordingly urged that contempt proceedings be initiated against the Respondent and his two learned counsel named above for their role and liability as accessories.
2. We have read the material and examined the provisions of the Ordinance and Order XXVII of the Supreme Court Rules, 1980. At the present stage, it is necessary that the factual aspects of the alleged breach of the undertakings be ascertained at a prima facie level. This is because although the events that followed the order dated 25.05.2022 (afternoon) and the evidentiary material collected subsequently by the Agencies are damaging, the role and liability of the Respondent as an absent party before the Court is still not clear. Accordingly, we direct that the office shall serve the reports submitted by the three Agencies together with Criminal M.A.No.1825 of 2022 filed in Criminal Original Petition No.148/2022, upon Mr. Imran Khan, Chairman PTI, Dr. Babar Awan, learned Sr.ASC and Mr. Faisal Fareed, learned ASC to enable them to file their replies to the same. The said persons shall also answer the allegations leveled by the learned Additional Attorney General for Pakistan in light of the material referred through written replies filed on or before 31.10.2022.
Thereafter, re-list in the same week.
3. When confronted with our query as to the maintainability of Crl.M.A.No.1738 of 2022, filed under Article 187 of the Constitution, seeking interim relief, the learned Additional Attorney General for Pakistan has sought time to obtain instructions and assist us in the matter. This order shall also be implemented by the office mutatis mutandis in respect of the petitioner in Constitution Petition No.19 of 2022.
With profound respect, I maintain my opinion expressed in para-4 of my note added to the order dated 26.05.2022, passed in Constitution Petition No.19 of 2022 and Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 3447/2022.