ALIMON Versus THE STATE AND ANOTHER

ORDER

1. The parties on appearance on 26‑10‑71 at the very outset requested for an adjournment to produce an application for compromise as they had entered into an agreement to hold the tenancy in joint ownership. The adjournment was allowed and compromise petition has accordingly been annexed as Annex ure `A'. It has further been ascertained that since the unit of tenancy was indivisible, parties may not be allocated separate field Nos. The scheme itself does not exclude sharing of a lot as there was no express condition to that effect. The State representative states that the co‑operative society should also have no objection as the parties are in cultivating possession of A the land jointly. The agreement is accordingly accepted. The parties may be allowed to hold this tenancy jointly in equal shares without partitioning it.

2. Order accordingly.