Mst. SHARIFAN vs ABDUL KHALIQ AND ANOTHER
This constitutional petition challenges the validity of a failure certificate issued by the Chairman of the Arbitration Council, Mirpurkhas, regarding a divorce (Talaq) proceeding. The core legal question is whether a notice of Talaq under the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961, and the subsequent failure certificate, are valid when submitted to a Chairman outside the jurisdiction where the wife resided at the time of the pronouncement. The petitioner argued that under Rule 3(b) of the West Pakistan Rules under the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961, the notice must be given to the Chairman of the Union Council where the wife was residing at the relevant time. The Court held that the failure certificate issued by the Mirpurkhas Arbitration Council was without jurisdiction and of no legal effect, as the petitioner was residing in Karachi when the Talaq was pronounced. The Court established the principle that strict compliance with the territorial jurisdiction requirements for serving Talaq notices is mandatory, and such notices must be submitted to the Chairman of the Union Council where the wife resides at the time of the pronouncement.
- To which Chairman must a notice of Talaq be sent under the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961?
- Is a failure certificate issued by a Chairman lacking territorial jurisdiction legally valid?
- Does the residence of the wife at the time of the pronouncement of Talaq determine the jurisdiction of the Arbitration Council?
- Section 7, Muslim Family Laws Ordinance 1961
- Section 7(1), Muslim Family Laws Ordinance 1961
- Rule 3(b), West Pakistan Rules under the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance 1961
' A pre-admission notice was issued to the respondents on 1st February, 1983, in response thereto the learned counsel for respondent No, 1 has filed counter-affidavit today. The contention-in- evolved in the petition is that the failure certificate issued by the Chariman, Arbitration Council, Mirpurkhas, after having received notice tinder section 7 of the Family Laws Ordinance, 1961 is wholly without jurisdiction as at the relevant time the petitioner who was the wife of respondent No, 1 was residing admittedly at Karachi and in accordance with the rule 3 (b) of the West Pakistan Rules under the Family Laws Ordinance, 1961 such notice should have been given to the Chairman of the area where the petitioner was residing at the relevant time e. g. When the divorce was given.
The contention raised on behalf of the petitioner appears to be correct on the language of sub-rule
(b) of rule 3 and I accordingly admit this petition to regular hearing. However, as the contesting respondent has appeared on a pre-admission notice and I have heard him on length on this point I will dispose of this petition as a regular petition.
2. Under section 7 (1) of the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961 if a person wishes to divorce his wife he is required to send intimation of the Talaq to the Chairman in writing haying done so and is also required to supply a copy thereof to the wife. Under sub-rule (b) of rule 3 of the rules framed under Muslim Family Laws Ordinance such a notice of `Talaq' is to be given to the Chairman of the Union Council where the wife at the relevant time was residing when the `Talaq' was pronounced.
The learned counsel for respondent No, 1 has produced before me a copy of notice under section 7
(1) of the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961 which shows that at the relevant time when the 'Talaq' was pronounced by the respondent No, 1 the petitioner was residing at Quarter No, 61 Korangi, Bus-stop 52, Karachi-31. In this view of the matter the copy of the notice under section 7 (1) of the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961, should have been A endorsed by the respondent No, 1 to the Chairman of the Korangi Area, where the petitioner was residing at the time the `Talaq' was pronounced and he alone could issue the failure certificate as required under the law. The failure certificate issued by the Chairman of the Arbitration Council, Mirpurkhas is therefore of no legal value and effect and I accordingly declare it as such. It will be open to the petitioner to send a copy of the notice under section 7 (1) of the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, in accordance with rule 3 (b) of the Rules framed under Muslim Family Laws Ordinance to the Chairman concerned who could take proceedings thereon in accordance with the law. The petition is allowed accordingly but there will be no order as to costs.
Cited by 9 cases
- Muhammad Adil Nawaz Bhatti vs Chairman Union Council and others 2024 LHC 538, 2024 PLJ Lahore 214, 2025 PLD Lahore 340
- MUHAMMAD ADIL NAWAZ BHATTI Versus CHAIRMAN UNION COUNCIL NO. 116-EME 2025 PLD 340
- Dr. Hassan Shahryar vs Sana Waqar through authorized attorney and 2 2023 CLC 2025
- Dr. Hassan Shahryar vs Sana Waqar and 2 others 2022 LHC 7304
- Syed Sajid Hussain Abidi vs Iram Shehzadi Abidi and others 2023 PLD Lahore 38
- Mst. Asma Bibi vs Chairman Reconciliation Committee, etc 2020 PLD Lahore 632, 2020 PLD Lahore 679, 2020 LHC 144
- Ms. SADAF MUNIR KHAN vs CHAIRMAN, RECONCILIATION COMMITTEE and 2 2019 PLD Lahore 285
- NAHEED FATIMA vs Syed AMIR AZAM RIZVI And Other 1987 PLD Karachi 670
- NAHEED FATIMA vs Syed AMIR AZAM RIZVI and OTHERS 1987 PLD Karachi 670