Syed MUHAMMAD IQBAL KAZMI Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN
ORDER
1. Granted.
1. 2 to 5. By invoking the extraordinary constitutional jurisdiction of this Court petitioner is seeking following reliefs:
2. Heard the petitioner and scanned the memo of petition. During hearing the petitioner very frankly conceded that he has not filed the instant petition for enforcement of any of his fundamental rights as enshrined in the Constitution nor same have been infringed in any manner. Besides, he also conceded that the learned Judge of this Court who is nominated for appointment as a Judge of Honourable Supreme Court is eligible and fulfills the requisite conditions as envisaged in the Constitution of 1973. Moreover, the Honourable apex Court has also observed that the appointment of a Judge of the High Court as a Judge of the Supreme Court is a fresh appointment and not a promotion.
3. For the foregoing reasons, we do not find any force in the instant petition which is accordingly dismissed in limine along with the pending miscellaneous applications.
4. MWA/M-84/Sindh. Petition dismissed.