INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN Versus Mian ASIM FAREED
ORDER
KHALIL-UR-REHMAN RAMDAY, J.--- The F.I.R. in question had been recorded for the alleged commission of offences punishable under sections 420, 406 and 379, P.P.C. at the instance of an officer of the Industrial Development Bank of Pakistan but had been quashed by the learned High Court only on the ground that section 7(4) of the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance No.XLVI of 2001 prescribed that it was only a Banking Court which could take cognizance of the offence under the Ordinance and that also on a complaint in writing made by a person authorized by the Bank in that behalf and that in the circumstances, recording of .an F.I.R. in the matter could not be sustained.
2. In the absence of any finding that the above mentioned offences mentioned in the F.I.R. were false and malicious and in the absence of a finding that if a particular forum or mode had been prescribed with respect to the taking of cognizance of an offence then the same also implied prohibition regarding the registration of an F.I.R., no such order could be passed nor the same could be approved. Needless to add that the registration of an F.I.R. and taking of cognizance of cases were two distinct and independent concepts under the criminal law; that if the intention of the law-maker was to put any clog on the registration of an F.I.R. then the Legislature would have said so specifically and that if the law put a condition only on the A taking of cognizance then it can never be read to imply prohibition on registration of F.I.Rs.
3. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties at some length, we find that the impugned order had not been legally and validly passed. In the circumstances, this petition is converted into an appeal which is allowed as a result whereof the said order dated 23-12-2004 passed by the learned High Court in Writ Petition No.1181 of 2004 is set aside.
M.H./I-2/SC ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Appeal allowed.
Cited by 11 cases
- Muhammad Usman vs Additional Sessions Judge, Rawalpindi and 3 others 2022 YLR 1131
- Mian Haroon Riaz Lucky and another vs The State and others 2021 PLJ SC (Cr.C. ) 250, 2021 SCMR 56
- Hafiz Shahid Pervez Ahmad vs Director, Anti Corruption Establishment and others 2021 KLR Criminal Cases 68
- Usman Farid Chishti vs Inspector Anti Corruption 2015 LHC 5324
- USMAN FARID CIIISHTI vs INSPECTOR ANTI-CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT and others 2016 PLJ Lahore 296, 2016 P Cr. L J 153
- USMAN FARID CHISHTI vs INSPECTOR ANTI-CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT etc. 2016 PLJ Lahore 296
- ABDUL RAUF CHAUDHRY and 2 otherss vs The STATE and 2 others 2013 CLD 738
- ABID MAHMOOD MALIK vs S.H.O., P.S. MARGALLA, etc PLJ 2013 Cr.C. (Islamabad) 379
- ABID MAHMOOD MALIK vs S.H.O., POLICE STATION MARGALLA and others 2013 MLD 736
- ABID MAHMOOD MALIK vs STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION 2013 MLD 736, PLJ 2013 Cr.C. (Islamabad) 379, 2013 CLD 508
- Muhammad Usman vs Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rawalpindi and 3 others 2022 PLJ Lahore 846