Pakistan Case Law
2006 YLR 1833

MUHAMMAD RAZZAQ Versus State

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation2006 YLR 1833
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Criminal Miscellaneous No.6548-B of 2005
Date2005-12-20
Judge(s)Khawaja Muhammad Sharif and M. A. Shahid Siddiqui
ResultBail refused
AI Summary — generated from this judgment; read the full text below and verify before relying on it.

This matter concerns a petition for post-arrest bail filed by the petitioner, who was apprehended with one kilogram of the narcotic substance known as 'Phakki'. The core legal question was whether the petitioner was entitled to the concession of bail given the nature of the recovery and the statutory restrictions on bail in narcotics cases. The Court held that since 'Phakki' has been declared a narcotic substance by a Full Bench of the High Court, the petitioner is not entitled to bail. The Court relied on the statutory prohibition against granting bail for such offences under the Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997. Consequently, the bail petition was dismissed, and the trial court was directed to conclude the proceedings expeditiously, noting that the challan had already been submitted.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Is 'Phakki' considered a narcotic substance for the purposes of bail under the Control of Narcotic Substances Act 1997?
  • Does Section 51-A of the Control of Narcotic Substances Act 1997 prohibit the grant of bail for the recovery of one kilogram of narcotic substance?
Laws & provisions referred
  • Section 9(b), Control of Narcotic Substances Act 1997
  • Section 51-A, Control of Narcotic Substances Act 1997
post-arrest bailnarcotic substancePhakkibail refusalControl of Narcotic Substances Act

ORDER

The learned counsel for petitioner submits that no time of alleged recovery has been mentioned in the complaint and the offence falls under section 9(b) of the Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997, so the petitioner is entitled to the concession of bail.

2. On the other hand, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of ANF has submitted that one kilogram of the narcotic substance has been recovered from the petitioner and this Court in Crl. Misc. No.7484-B of 2005 has dismissed the bail application of accused in whose possession the same quantity of narcotic was recovered.

3. We have heard the learned counsel for parties. The petitioner was apprehended with one kilogram of "Phakki", which has been declared a narcotic substance by a Full Bench of this Court. So the bail cannot be granted to the petitioner in view of section 51-A of the Control of Narcotic Substances Act. This petition is, therefore, dismissed.

4. At this stage the learned counsel submits that the challan has not been submitted. On the other hand the A.S.-I., who has brought on record after going through the Zimi has submitted that the challan has already been submitted on 20-7-2005. The learned trial Court is directed to conclude the trial expeditiously.

H.B.T./M-42/L ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Bail refused.

Cited by 1 case

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.