NIAZ HUSSAIN SHAH Versus State

ORDER

Office objection is overruled.

2. Granted.

3. Granted subject to all just exceptions for the time being.

4. Mr. Farid Ahmed Dayo, learned counsel for the applicant/accused has prayed that the name of applicant/accused has not been disclosed in the F.I.R. and a false and concocted case is prepared with mala fide intention in connivance with the complainant party due to departmental disputes amongst the officers and there is delay of about six years in lodging of the F.I.R. for which no plausible explanation has been furnished while recording the F.I.R. and no role of causing loss is attributed to the applicant/accused.

5. Without touching the merits and demerits of the case, protective bail is granted to the applicant accused subject to his furnishing surety in the sum of Rs.50,000 and P.R. bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Nazir of this Court.

This order of protective bail shall remain effective for a period of ten days from today and the same shall automatically be lapsed on 4-3-2004 or upon applicant/accused's surrendering himself before the trial Court, whichever is earlier.

H.B.T./N-61/L Protective bail granted.