BASHIR AHMED Versus MUHAMMAD NAZIR TAHIR

ORDER

Learned counsel inter alia contends that the two tribunals below had no duly appreciated the effect of the previous statements of respondents Nos. and 4 that the petitioners were occupying the disputed property as trespassers; and that the petitioners could not be treated as statutory tenants in pursuance of section 30 of the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation Act. 1958 because the property in dispute was. neither a house nor a shop.

2. Admit. Notice.

3. The operation of the impugned order shall remain, suspended meanwhile subject to notice.

4. In view of the nature of this case it shall be heard within six months.

M. Y. M. Case admitted.