AMTUL KABIR Versus SAFIA KHATOON
ORDER
1. There is no jurisdiction to entertain this Revision application because in the first instance, the High Court does not have the powers to review the matter in any manner under the provisions of Sindh Rented Permises Ordinance, 1979. The only power is of appeal under section 21, otherwise rest of the provinces of C.P.C. are not attracted or applied, Moreover the ground of review is that certain authorities were not cited by the Counsel. This is hardly a ground for entertaining a review application as it was a lapse on the part of the appellant's counsel and not on the part of the Court. This case is not covered either by the provisions under S. 114 of C.P.C. or Order 47, as there is no discovery of new matter on evidence which were not within the knowledge of the appellant or the counsel and there is no mistake or error on the face of the record. Accordingly this application is dismissed.
2. A.A./Aโ836/K Review application dismissed.
Cited by 2 cases
- Muhammad Ayub & another vs The Member (Judicial-III), BOR, Punjab, Lahore, etc 2021 MLD 2110, 2021 LHC 2018
- ALLAH DITTA vs BASHIR AHMED 1996 CLC 907