MUHAMMAD HASHAM ANSARI Versus BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION, KARACHI through Secretary

ORDER

1. FAISAL ARAB, J.--- Applicant has impugned the concurrent findings of the lower Courts stating that his correct date of birth is 19-11-1980 and not 19-11-1979.

2. It has come on record that the applicant at the time of filing his Admission Form had mentioned his date of birth as 19-11-1979. The respondent accordingly issued Matric Certificate in the year 1998 mentioning the same date of birth. The suit for correction in the date of birth was filed by the applicant after nine years. Counsel for the applicant is unable to point out any defect in the concurrent findings of both the courts below. In absence of any defect of misreading or non-reading of evidence in concurrent findings of two courts below, interference of High Court in civil revision amounts to improper exercise of revisional jurisdiction. It is settled law that re-examination and reappraisal of evidence is not permissible in revisional jurisdiction even if another view different from the impugned order can also be taken.

3. This Court finds no illegality or irregularity in the concurrent findings of the lower courts which do not require interference by this Court. Therefore, the revision application is dismissed.

4. H.B.T./M-20/K Petition dismissed.