Pakistan Case Law
1983 SC MR 171

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH COLLECTOR, LYALLPUS (FAISALABAD) vs Malik GHULAM HAIDER

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation1983 SC MR 171
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.C. R. No. 706 of 1976
Date1982-06-22
Judge(s)Nasim Hasan Shah, Muhammad Afzal Zullah, Shafi-ur-Rehman
ResultLeave granted
AI Summary — generated from this judgment; read the full text below and verify before relying on it.

This matter comes before the Supreme Court of Pakistan upon a petition for leave to appeal filed by the Province of Punjab against a judgment of the High Court dated 14-3-1981. The core legal question examined by the Court is whether, following the establishment of the Service Tribunal, the High Court possessed the jurisdiction to pass a judgment restoring a trial court decree that declared the correct date of birth of a civil servant, ordered its substitution in his service record, and continued him in service on that basis. Granting leave to appeal, the Supreme Court held that the operation of the impugned judgment and decree of the High Court shall be suspended meanwhile. The principle laid down relates to the jurisdictional limits of the High Court in service matters concerning civil servants after the constitutional and statutory establishment of Service Tribunals.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Whether after the establishment of Service Tribunal, the High Court could restore a decree of the trial Court declaring the correct date of birth of a civil servant?
  • Does the High Court retain jurisdiction in service matters of civil servants after the establishment of the Service Tribunal?
service tribunaldate of birthcivil servantjurisdiction of high courtleave to appeal

ORDER

1. SHAFI-UR-REHMAN, J. -Leave to appeal is granted to examine. Whether after the establishment of Service Tribunal, the High Court by its judgment dated 14-3-1981 could restore a decree of the trial Court declaring the correct" date of birth of the respondent, a civil servant, its substitution in his service record, and continuing him in service on its basis.

2. The impugned judgment and decree are suspended meanwhile.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.