RIAZ Versus THE STATE

ORDER

1. The complainant has entered appearance and states that no doubt, he had lodged the first information report but he had done so because he was a Lambardar, otherwise, he is not aware of the facts of the case. The eye-witnesses named in the FIR have also resiled and their statements recorded under section 164, Cr.P.C. have been attached with this petition. In this view of the matter, the petitioner is entitled to the grant of bail. Accordingly, I direct that the petitioner A shall be released on bail provided he furnishes security in the sum of Rs. 50,000 (Rupees fifty thousand) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner, Chiniot.

2. SA./R-53/L. Bail allowed,