SAIFULLAH Versus THE STATE

ORDER

This writ petition has arisen out of a pre-emption suit. Petitioner is a defendant in that suit. The suit was decreed by the Civil Judge, Ferozewala, District Sheikhupura whereupon appeal was taken before the District Judge, Sheikhupura. The learned District Judge remanded the suit to the Trial Court for fresh decision. After the remand of the suit, the petitioner made an application for amendment of written statement, which was not allowed. Order passed in this regard was challenged by the petitioner by means of an appeal but without success. He has, therefore, invoked the Constitutional jurisdiction of this Court.

2. I have gone through the application for amendment of the written statement. It relates to the manner in which the evidence was recorded in the case. This aspect of the matter has nothing to do with the pleadings. of the parties. If the petitioner has any objection in respect of the manner in which the evidence was recorded, he should raise argument in this behalf instead of amending the written statement. 1, therefore, find no fault with the orders of the two Courts below by which they declined to allow the desired amendment.

3. Resultantly, this writ petition fails. It is dismissed in limine.

M.BA./R-25/L Petition dismissed.