STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN THROUGH THE BANKING OFFICER, BANKING CONTROL DEPARTMENT, KARACHI Versus MESSRS UNI PACKS (PVT.) LTD.
Learned Collector (Consolidation), Sheikhupura consolidated the land in question on 20β12β1980 by making certain adjustments in the Khatas of the parties. This order was challenged by the respondents by way of an appeal which was heard and allowed by learned Additional Commissioner (Cons.), Lahore Division, Lahore on 23β2β1981. The said order was further challenged by the petitioner by filing a revision petition before the learned Member (Cons.), Board of Revenue, Punjab, which was dismissed by the learned Member on 6β12β1981. It was observed by the learned Member that 4 Kanals 4 Marlas of class 1 land was given to the petitioner more than his actual entitlement and further his land was reduced from 23 blocks to six blocks after consolidation operations.
2. It is contended by the learned counsel that without obtaining the consent of the petitioner his valuable land was resumed and allotted to tile respondents. Attention of the Court was drawn to Annexure Rβ2 which shows that before the consolidation operations, consent of Barkat Ali petitioner was obtained by the Consolidation authorities. These are all disputed questions offacts, which cannot at all be gone into by this Court in its constitutional jurisdiction. The impugned orders appear to be just and proper. Both the A parties were accommodated in accordance with law. Learned counsel failed to point out any jurisdictional defects in the impugned orders. This being so, there is no substance in the petition which is dismissed with no order as to costs.
A.A./Bβ14/L Petition dismissed.
Cited by 1 case
- MANZOOR AHMAD Versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE 2002 PLD 62