NAZIR AHMAD Versus STATE

ORDER

This petition under Article 199 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 calls in question a revisional order of the Additional District Judge, Faisalabad dated 9‑1‑1996 upholding the order passed by the Trial Court on 29‑10‑1995 dismissing the application under Order 1, rule 10, C.P.C. filed by the petitioners to be impleaded as parties to a suit instituted by Ehsan-ul-Haq respondent No. l against the Province of Punjab in respect of property comprised in Kilas Nos. 15/2, 21/22/24 and 25.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has contended that the petitioners are the allottee of the land in dispute and as such they have legitimate interest in the subject‑matter of the suit and should have been impleaded as a party.

3. I am not in agreement with the learned counsel. Learned Additional District Judge, on thorough appraisal of the evidence on the record and on consideration of the site plan to which reference is being made today by the learned counsel before me, has observed that the petitioners claim to be allotees of Kilas Nos.296 and 287 but none of these fall in the Khasm numbers which are in dispute in the suit. That being so, no justification for interference in the exercise of Constitutional jurisdiction has been made out.

Dismissed in limine.

H.B.T./N‑8/L Petition dismissed.