Pakistan Case Law
1997 MLD 3221

IMRAN Versus STATE

โญ Prefer in Google
Citation1997 MLD 3221
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Criminal Miscellaneous No.924/B of 1996
Date1996-11-26
Judge(s)Muhammad Aqil Mirza
ResultBail granted

ORDER

Bail is sought in a case registered under section 12 of Ordinance 7 of 1979 and section 377, P.P.C. The three accused persons are allowed to have committed sodomy with Muhammad Ajmal who is son of the complainant.

2. It is submitted by the learned counsel that all the petitioners are students studying in 9th class and they are less than 16 years of age. Similarly, Muhammad Ajmal with whom sodomy is alleged to have been committed is student of 9th class. It is further submitted that the swabs sent to the Chemical Examiner have not been found to stained with semen. According to the learned counsel it is a case of further inquiry as to whether the act of sodomy has been committed or not. The fathers of all the three accused persons are present in Court. On the last date of hearing they had offered to go to the village of the complainant for the purpose of seeking forgiveness from the father of Muhammad Ajmal, even though, according to them, the offence has not been committed by' their sons. Muhammad Taqi complainant alongwith his son is present in Court. He states that the fathers of the petitioners had sought forgiveness from him in a room. He further states that forgiveness should have been sought in some open assembly, so that people of the village could have known this fact. In open Court today, the fathers of all the three accused persons have sought forgiveness from Muhammad Taqi as also from his son. In order to restore the honour of Muhammad Taqi and his son as a condition for grant of bail it is directed in the interest of justice, that the fathers of all the accused persons will go after Zohr Prayers in the Jamia Masjid of village Nanakpur on 27โ€‘11โ€‘1996 and offer apology, as desired by the complainant.

Be that as it may, in view of the fact that report of chemical examiner does not support the prosecution case and the petitioners are students of 9th Class, this application is allowed. The petitioners are admitted to bail in the sum of Rs.20,000 each, with one surety each, in the like amount to the satisfaction of Judicial/Illaqa Magistrate, Pakpattan. Nothing said herein shall prejudice the case of either party on merits.

H.B.T /Iโ€‘27/L Bail granted.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.