2003 MLD 1400

FAROOQ AHMAD Versus Mian SHAHID MAHMOOD

Share on WhatsApp ⭐ Prefer in Google

Citation2003 MLD 1400

CourtLahore High Court

Case No.Criminal, Original No.686-W of 2000

Date2001-09-27

Judge(s)Ch. Ijaz Ahmad and Mian Saqib Nisar

Authored byCh. Ijaz Ahmad

ResultPetition dismissed

ORDER

CH. IJAZ AHMAD, J.---- Respondent was directed to decide the representation of the appellant vide order dated 3-5-2000. Respondent decided the representation of the petitioner vide order dated 16-5-2001. Appellant being aggrieved, filed this contempt application.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent committed contempt of this Court, as designated authority had not decided the representation of the petitioner. He further submits that the designated authority did not provide personal hearing to the petitioner, therefore, respondent committed contempt of this Court.

3. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that respondent had decided the representation of the petitioner, as directed by this Court, vide order dated 16-5-2000. He further submits that respondent did not commit the contempt of this Court.

4. We have considered the contention of learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. Since the representation of the petitioner was decided by the respondent on 16-5-2001. After perusing the reply, we do not incline to issue notice to the respondent. It is settled principle of law that the contempt is always between the contemner and the Court.

This petition is dismissed.

H.B.T./F-176/L Petition dismissed.