Pakistan Case Law
1989 MLD 4049

ABDUL WAHID KHAN Versus STATE

โญ Prefer in Google
Citation1989 MLD 4049
CourtSindh High Court
Judge(s)Allahdino G. Memon

ORDER

1. The applicant is facing trial under sections 302, 392/109, P.P.C. alongwith co-accused before the learned IIIrd Additional Sessions Judge, Central Karachi.

2. The bail is being sought on the ground of statutory delay, and it has been contended by Mr. Muhammad Yasin Azad learned counsel appearing for the applicant, that the applicant has remained in custody for 2-1/2 years but the case has not yet been concluded. That there are 10 witnesses more to be examined by the prosecution. He has further contended that except for two adjournments one on 15-11-1988 for 17 days, and the other on 18-2-1989 for 7 days, the applicant or his counsel did not obtain any other adjournment and the delay which had occurred in the disposal of the case has not been occasioned by any act or omission of the applicant or his counsel. That in spite of the directions from the Court twice in the bail application of co-accused Azizullah, the case of the applicant has not been concluded, and therefore, the applicant was entitled to bail.

3. Mr. K.M. Nadeem learned A.A.G. appearing for the State, has conceded to the grant of bail to the applicant in view of the fact that the material witnesses have been examined and the applicant has remained in custody for more than 2 years.

4. I have considered the contentions of the learned counsel, and have gone through the case diary. The record shows that the applicant has remained in custody for more than 2 years and only six witnesses have been examined by now. According to the learned counsel appearing for the applicant 10 more witnesses remain to be examined by the prosecution. Of course the accused have obtained six adjournments but so far the applicant was concerned, only two adjournment have been obtained on his behalf and therefore, it cannot be said that he or his counsel were in any way responsible for the delay in conclusion of the trial. I, therefore direct that the applicant shall be released on bail on furnishing surety in the sum of Rs.50,000 (Rupees fifty thousand) and P.R. Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge.

5. S.A./A-621/K

6. Bail allowed.

Cited by 1 case

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.