BASHIR AHMED Versus STATE

ORDER

1. The contention of the learned counsel is that there is case and counter case between the parties. All the accused in the counter‑case are released on bail by the trial Court. Part assigned to the present applicant is of causing gun shot injury to prosecution witness Moula Bux on his shoulder, which is not vital part of the body and is simple in nature. Applicant is complainant in the counter‑case and himself is injured. Learned counsel further contended that it is yet to be determined which party was aggressor. Co‑accused who were armed with hatchets and responsible for causing hatchet injuries to P.Ws. have already been granted bail by the trial Court. Applicant is not attributed any injury to the deceased. Learned counsel has relied upon PLP 1989 Kar. 37 and 1993 PCr.LJ 1383.

2. Mr. Abdul Sattar Chohan learned counsel for the State has conceded to the grant of bail, and has contended that the case of the applicant requires further enquiry, as it is yet to be determined who is aggressor party. In view of the 1 circumstances, bail is granted to the applicant on his furnishing one surety in the sum of Rs.1,00,000 & PR bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

3. N.H.Q./B‑261/K Bail granted