ABDUL REHMAN Versus STATE
ORDER
1. QAISAR KHAN, J. ‑‑Abdul Rehman was tried by the Additional Sessions Judge Hyderabad for the murder of two police officials and by his judgment dated the 6th of June 1970 sentenced to death on both counts. The appeal of the convict was dismissed by the High Court on the 10th of August 1971 and the death sentences, were confirmed The convict filed petition for special leave to appeal in this Court which was granted and this Court by its judgment dated the 1st of April 1975 accepted the appeal to the extent that the death sentences were commuted to life imprisonments.
2. Abdul Rehman has filed this review petition praying for converting his sentences from life imprisonment to transportation for life. The petition is barred by 1119 days but since the mistake was apparent on the face of the,, record and the petitioner who is an illiterate man was in jail all through we would therefore condone the delay in filing this petition.
3. Notice had been issued in this case to the Advocate on Record for the State but no body cared to appear despite service. After hearing Mr. Noor Ahmad Noori, Advocate on Record for the petitioner we have come to the conclusion that the review petition deserves acceptance. The occurrence took place in 1964 when punishment for murder was death or transportation for 1 life. Transportation for life under section 57, P. P. C. meant transportation for 20 years. The amendment in the Penal Code was introduced with effect from the 14th of April 1972, by Law Reforms Ordinance XII of 1972. Accord ing to the amended section 302 the punishment for murder was death or life imprisonment and life; imprisonment according to section 57, P. P. C. meant imprisonment for 25 years.
4. According to Article 12 of the Constitution no law could authorise punishment of a person for an offence by a penalty greater than the penalty prescribed by law for the offence at the time the offence was committed. The accused could not therefore be sentenced to life imprisonment. He bad to be sentenced to transportation for life. We therefore accept this petition and convert the punishment of the petitioner on each of the two counts to transportation for life instead of life imprisonment.
5. Petition accepted.
Cited by 20 cases
- Liaquat Ali vs The State etc 2023 LHC 1228, PLJ 2023 Cr.C. 814, 2024 YLR 1082
- Liaquat Ali vs The State etc 2023 LHC 1228, PLJ 2023 Cr.C. 814, 2024 YLR 1082
- Khalid Mattoo vs The State & another 2022 LHC 6207
- Mirpurkhas Sugar Mills & others vs Federation of Pakistan & others 2022 SHC 70, 2022 CLD 352
- Mst. Sharmila Faruqui vs Government Of Sindh through Chief Secretary 2019 P Cr. L J 1407
- A. REHMAN MALIK and another vs THE STATE and another 2010 PLD Lahore 353
- A. REHMAN MALIK and another vs STATE and another PLJ 2010 Cr.C. (Lahore) 599
- TASNIM JALAL and others vs DEPUTY DIRECTOR, A.N.F. and others 2010 SCMR 72
- Sayed SAFDAR ALI RAZVI vs STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION CIVIL 2006 P Cr. L J 187
- SAYED SAFDAR ALI RAZVI vs STATION HOUSE OFFICER; POLICE STATION CIVIL 2006 PLJ Lahore 453
- SYED RIFFAT ASKARI vs THE STATE THROUGH THE SPECIAL PROSECUTOR, APPOINTED UNDER SECTION 17 OF THE EHTESAB ORDINANCE, 1996 And Other K.L.R. 1997 Criminal Cases 257
- RIFFAT ASKARI vs THE STATE 1997 PLD Lahore 285
- FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN vs THE STATE K.L.R. 1997 Criminal Cases 615
- FAIZ ALI SHAH vs THE STATE 1989 PLD Supreme Court (AJ&K) 61
- BHAI KHAN And Other vs THE STATE 1992 PLD Supreme Court 14
- Mian MUHAMMAD NAWAZ SHARIF vs THE STATE 2009 PLD Supreme Court 814
- Tasneem Jalal vs Deputy Director ANF, etc 2020 P SC (C rl.) 139, 2020 SCMR 454, 2020 SCP 4
- NAWAB DIN Versus THE STATE 1996 PLD 304
- Mian MUHAMMAD NAWAZ SHARIF Versus State 2010 PLD 81
- SAJJAD HAIDER Versus State 2026 SCMR 1339