MUHAMMAD NAWAZ Versus FAIZ MUHAMMAD

ORDER

MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J. ‑‑Leave to appeal in these two petitions has been sought by vendees in pre‑emption matters against judgment dated 27‑10‑1980 of the Lahore High Court; whereby their Civil Revisions were dismissed.

2. The respondent's side has succeeded in obtaining pre‑emption decrees. The only question agitated by the learned counsel is that of improvements made by the petitioners/ vendees. The same having been agitated before the High Court, it was held that the alleged improvements were made before the sale of the suit land. That being so, it was held that the petitioners would not be entitled to any compensation for such improvements. The learned counsel has not been able to urge any point against this reasoning. That being so, there is no force in these petitions and the same are dismissed.

M.I./M‑438/S Petitions dismissed.