Pakistan Case Law
1988 SCMR 1282

MUHAMMAD RAMZAN Versus RAMZAN

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation1988 SCMR 1282
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Civil Petitions for Special Leave to Appeal Nos.50 and 51 of 1982
Judge(s)Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Saad Saood Jan
Authored byMuhammad Afzal Zullah
ResultPetitions dismissed

ORDER

MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.‑‑ These are vendees' petitions for leave to appeal and have arisen out of pre‑emption decrees granted in favour of the respondents /pre‑emptors. The High Court having dismissed the petitioners' Constitutional Petitions they have now sought leave to appeal.

2. The learned counsel contended that the respondents/pre‑emptors could not have succeeded on account of the principle and bar of partial pre‑emption. We, oh his request, having perused the relevant record, agree with the High Court that the findings on the question of partial pre‑emption, which go against the petitioners, are unexceptionable. There was no justification to interfere with them In the Constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court. That being so, these petitions are dismissed.

M.I./M‑450/S Petitions dismissed.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.