MUHAMMAD RAMZAN Versus RAMZAN
ORDER
MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.‑‑ These are vendees' petitions for leave to appeal and have arisen out of pre‑emption decrees granted in favour of the respondents /pre‑emptors. The High Court having dismissed the petitioners' Constitutional Petitions they have now sought leave to appeal.
2. The learned counsel contended that the respondents/pre‑emptors could not have succeeded on account of the principle and bar of partial pre‑emption. We, oh his request, having perused the relevant record, agree with the High Court that the findings on the question of partial pre‑emption, which go against the petitioners, are unexceptionable. There was no justification to interfere with them In the Constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court. That being so, these petitions are dismissed.
M.I./M‑450/S Petitions dismissed.