DOST ALI SHAH Versus SHAUKAT ALI SHAH
ORDER
MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.‑ ‑For the grounds taken in the application, the main petition is restored to its original number.
2. In C.P. 350 of 1983, the petitioner/ father challenged the grant of maintenance to his minor son who is infirm and disabled. His Constitutional Petition having been dismissed by the High Court, leave to appeal has now been sought.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner admits that the amount of maintenance‑‑ Rs.100 per mensem for such a boy is not at all excessive; but he has contended that the petitioner did not have enough resources to pay even this meagre amount.
4. The learned Single Judge in the High Court having noticed the plea raised in this Court, has repelled it with cogent reasons. No justification having been found for interference by this Court, leave to appeal is refused and the petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
M ‑B. A. /D‑20/S Petition dismissed.
Cited by 1 case
- M. SALEEM AHMAD SIDDIQUI vs Mst. SABIRA BEGUM and others 2001 YLR 2329