KAISER ZAMANI Versus RASHID BEGUM

ORDER

MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.‑‑ A tenant has sought leave to appeal from order of the High Court dismissing his Constitutional petition, wherein he had challenged his eviction. No stay was granted in this case. The petitioner has already been evicted.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the findings with regard to the bona fides of the respondents' requirement suffer from infirmity; because; there are discrepancies in the evidence led from the respondents‑side; that there was no assertion that the accommodation with the respondent was not fit for the use of the family; and further, that she was guilty of concealment.

3. All these questions appertain to the findings of fact which were concurrently reached by the Rent Controller and the First Appellate Court. The refusal by the High Court to interfere in its Constitutional jurisdiction, was unexceptionable. This petition fails and is, accordingly, dismissed.

M.B.A./K‑56/S Petition dismissed.