1988 SCMR 1366
RASHID Versus ALI HASSAN
ORDER
1. MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.‑ ‑Leave to appeal has been sought by the pre‑emptors' side against the acceptance of the Regular Second Appeal of the respondents/ vendees' side by the High Court.
2. The only issue pressed during the argument by the learned counsel is of estoppel. (Ex. D.3)‑‑the receipt has been used against the petitioners. If the receipt Ex. D.3 is genuine, the learned counsel conceded that the petitioners would have no case.
3. After hearing the arguments on the question of the genuineness of the receipt, we are satisfied that the findings of fact reached by the High Court in this behalf do not suffer from any infirmity legal or otherwise. These petitions fail and are accordingly dismissed.
4. M.B.A./R‑55/S Petition dismissed.