BASHIR AHMAD Versus ABDUR REHMAN
ORDER
1. MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.‑ ‑This petition for leave to appeal by the vendees in a pre‑emption matter, calls in question the dismissal of their Civil Revision by the High Court.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that they had not been afforded adequate opportunity for producing evidence before the trial Court. Wt en questioned as to the point on which they would produce evidence if an opportunity is now afforded to them the learned counsel stated that they would make are attempt that the signatures of a pre‑emptor /plaintiff on the Wakalatnama, in favour of the lawyer, would be proved as non‑genuine. He at the same time admitted that the concerned plaintiff never disowned his signatures throughout the litigation. That being so no useful purpose would be served now to grant leave to appeal on the point raised by the learned counsel. It is not a fit case for the grant of leave to appeal. The petition is, therefore, dismissed.
3. M.B.A. /B‑58/S Petition dismissed.