Pakistan Case Law
1988 SCMR 1420

ABDUL HAMEED Versus STATE

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation1988 SCMR 1420
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Criminal Appeal No.157 of 1987
Date1987-11-14
Judge(s)Nasim Hasan Shah, S. A. Nusrat and Ali Hussain Qazilbash
Authored byNasim Hasan Shah
ResultOrder accordingly
AI Summary — generated from this judgment; read the full text below and verify before relying on it.

This matter arises from a criminal appeal before the Supreme Court of Pakistan concerning a sentence of death. The core legal question involves the extent to which a compromise between the parties can affect the sentencing of the convicts in a criminal case. The court held that the compromise arrived at between the parties is fair and proper, and consequently accepted it. The holding dictates that the death sentence of the appellant is reduced to life imprisonment, the fine imposed on the convicts is set aside in view of the compensation paid under the terms of the compromise, and the benefit of Section 382-B of the Code of Criminal Procedure is extended to the appellant and four co-accused. The key principle laid down is that a genuine and fair compromise between parties in a criminal matter can form the basis for mitigating a sentence, including the reduction of a death penalty to life imprisonment and the setting aside of fines.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Can a compromise between parties result in the reduction of a death sentence to life imprisonment?
  • Whether the benefit of Section 382-B of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898 can be allowed in the computation of a sentence pursuant to a compromise?
  • Can the fine imposed on convicts be set aside in view of compensation paid under the terms of a compromise?
Laws & provisions referred
  • Section 382-B, Code of Criminal Procedure 1898
criminal appealcompromisereduction of sentencedeath sentencelife imprisonmentcompensationfine

ORDER

1. NASIM HASAN SHAH, J.‑‑ The parties have entered into a compromise to end their dispute for ever.

2. We think that the compromise arrived at between the parties is fair and proper and we are, therefore, inclined to accept it.

3. The appeal is allowed to the extent that the sentence of death passed against Abdul Hameed appellant is reduced to life imprisonment. He is also allowed the benefit of section 382‑B, Cr.P.C. in the computation of sentence. The benefit of section 382‑B, Cr.P.C. is also allowed to other 4 co‑accused in the matter of computation of their sentence. The fine imposed on the convicts is also set aside in view of the compensation being paid under the terms of the compromise. The appeal is disposed of in the above terms.

4. M.I:/A‑238/S Order accordingly.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.