MAQBOOL AHMAD Versus AFZAL
ORDER
1. MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.‑‑ These two petitions for leave to appeal have been instituted by a pre‑emptor calling in question the dismissal of her two civil revision petitions by the High Court it pre‑emption matters involving a common question, which has been raised by her learned counsel. According to him, she has been non suited on the ground of estoppel; the decision of which depended upon the authenticity/ genuineness of document described by the learned counsel as Dastbardari. It is correct that the trial Court found this issue in favour of the petitioner but the appeal Court and the High Court have reached concurrent findings against the petitioner.
2. After hearing the learned counsel at some length, we find no justification for interference with such findings of fact as have been reached in this case. The impugned judgment does not suffer from any infirmity, legal or otherwise. These petitions are dismissed.
3. M.I. /M‑484/S Petitions dismissed.