Pakistan Case Law
1988 SCMR 1560

GHULAM MUHAMMAD Versus MUHAMMAD RAFIQ

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation1988 SCMR 1560
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Civil Petition No.1115 of 1983
Date1988-05-22
Judge(s)Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Saad Saood Jan
Authored bySaad Saood Jan
ResultLeave granted

ORDER

SAAD SAOOD JAN, J.‑‑ The petitioner's suit for pre‑emption was decreed by a Civil Judge at Gujrat on 23‑4‑1975. In the judgment delivered by the learned trial Court, he was called upon to deposit the purchase price by 3‑5‑1975. However, the Reader of the Court gave him a chit wherein it was stated that the purchase money was to be deposited by 14‑5‑1975. The petitioner obtained certified copies of the judgment and decree on 9‑5‑1975. It was then that he learnt that the Reader of the Court had misinformed him with regard to the date of deposit. He filed an appeal before the Additional District Judge‑and produced the chit given to him by the Reader. The learned Additional District Judge dismissed his appeal. He then approached the High Court in revisional jurisdiction but without any success. He now seeks leave to appeal from this Court.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has produced before us the chit which was given to him by the Reader. The chit is in a torn condition. It is stated that it was torn into pieces by the Ahalmad of the trial Court. However that may be, the pieces when joined together read as follows:‑

It is to be noticed that illiterate litigants are usually provided with chits by the Readers and Ahalmads of the Civil Courts informing them about the dates by which certain acts are required to be done or to which the proceedings have been postponed. The question for consideration is where Reader of a Court issues a chit indicating the date by which a certain act is to be done, can an illiterate litigant be penalized for acting on the information contained therein. This question requires consideration. Leave to appeal is granted. Security for costs in the sum of Rs.5,000. The appeal may be made ready for hearing on the present record with permission to the parties to file additional documents, if necessary. The petitioner should paste the pieces on a sheet of paper and produce them at the time of hearing of the appeal. In the meanwhile, he should place a photostat copy of the sheet on the record.

M.I.IG‑104/S Leave granted.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.