MUHAMMAD NAWAZ Versus GULLAI

ORDER

1. MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J .‑‑Leave to appeal has been sought by a plaintiff against the dismissal of his Civil Revision by the High Court. He had challenged a decree which was passed in favour of the respondent and against the petitioner by the latter's consent, as having been obtained by fraud. His suit was dismissed. His appeal was also dismissed. He having failed in the High Court, has now sought leave to appeal.

2. After hearing the learned counsel, we feel that the matter stands concluded by the findings of fact against the petitioner.

3. Learned counsel was unable to show any legal infirmity in the impugned judgment. It needs to be mentioned that a so‑called jurisdictional point raised before the High Court, was also dealt with properly. No justification has been made out for interference. Leave to appeal is, therefore, refused.

4. M.I. /M‑526/S Petition dismissed.