ANJUMAN TAHAFAZ-E-HAQOOQ-E-SHAHRIAN, QAUIDABAD Versus MUHAMMAD IQBAL

ORDER

1. MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J. ‑‑These two matters arise out of the same case. Two parties have separately challenged the same judgment passed by the High Court irf favour of respondents' side in its constitutional jurisdiction.

2. C.P. 941 was dismissed for non‑prosecution. For reasons stated in the restoration application, we restore the same.

3. After hearing both the learned counsel, we are satisfied that the petitioner in C.P.941 had in the circumstances of this case, no locus standi to challenge the order passed in favour of the respondents' side by the Assistant Director, The Housing and Physical Planning Department, Lahore, before the Deputy Secretary (Development) Lahore, Housing and Physical Planning Department. Latter's order was challenged before the High Court and was set aside by it in writ jurisdiction. We are also satisfied that the petitioners (including the Punjab Government) in C.P.971 not having challenged the order of the Assistant Director, had accepted the same. Therefore, they also, in the circumstances of this case, have no locus standi now to file this petition for leave to appeal.

4. Accordingly on account of the aforestated position, these petitions must fail and are accordingly dismissed.

5. M. I. /A‑306‑S Petition dismissed.