Pakistan Case Law
1988 SCMR 831

KHIZAR HAYAT Versus STATE

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation1988 SCMR 831
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Criminal Appeal No.3 and Criminal Petition No.27 of 1988
Date1988-01-31
Judge(s)Shafiur Rehman, Ali Hussain Qazilbash and S.Usman Ali Shah
Authored byShafiur Rahman
ResultBail granted
AI Summary — generated from this judgment; read the full text below and verify before relying on it.

This matter concerns a petition for leave to appeal against the refusal of bail in a criminal case involving charges of murder. The petitioners, along with a co-accused named Zawar Hussain, were charged with the murder of Mst. Manzooran. The prosecution alleged that while Zawar Hussain performed the actual firing, one petitioner raised a lalkara, and the other was present while armed with a gun. The core legal question was whether the petitioners were entitled to bail pending trial given the nature of their alleged participation. The Supreme Court observed that the encounter appeared unplanned and that the pre-existing enmity was specifically between the co-accused Zawar Hussain and the deceased. Consequently, the Court held that the implication of the petitioners in the crime required further inquiry to determine their actual guilt. The Court converted the petition into an appeal, allowed the appeal, and admitted the petitioners to bail, establishing the principle that where the specific role and culpability of an accused in a murder case require further investigation, bail should be granted.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Does the presence of an accused at the scene of a crime while armed, without evidence of a planned encounter, constitute sufficient grounds to deny bail?
  • Is a case fit for further inquiry when the specific role of the accused in a murder charge is contested and the enmity is primarily between the deceased and a co-accused?
post-arrest bailmurderfurther inquirycriminal appealvicarious liabilitypre-trial detention

ORDER

1. SHAFIUR RAHMAN, J.‑‑The two petitioners alongwith one Zawar Hussain, are charged for the murder of Mst.Manzooran on 28‑2‑1987. The actual firing was done by Zawar Hussain. Subs, petitioner is stated to have raised a lalkara. The other petitioner is charged for his presence in the company of the two while armed with a gun.

2. Prima facie the encounter of the petitioners and the deceased was not planned and the enmity existed between Zawar and Mst. Manzooran. The implication of the two petitioners in the crime is, therefore, a question fit for further inquiry with regard to their guilt.

3. Their petition is converted into an appeal. The learned Assistant Advocate‑General has been heard in the matter. The petitioner are admitted to bail in the sum of Rs.20,000 each with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the A.C.Chiniot.

4. M . Y . H . / K‑44/ S Bail granted

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.