NAWAB DIN Versus SULTAN AHMAD AWAN

ORDER

1. MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J. ‑‑This leave to appeal .petition is by a defendant against whom an‑ ex parte money decree wits passed. His application for setting aside of the ex pane decree was dismissed. The High Court having also dismissed his civil revision, lie has now sought leave to appeal.

2. While analysing the impugned judgments, the learned counsel frankly stated that the findings against the petitioner on the points that he was duly served; that he had re‑agitated the matter after the period of limitation; and that the amount was not deposited in accordance with law, might be correct; but, according to him, the petitioner has an arguable case on merits.

3. We do not agree with him. The findings of the High Court on all the points urged before it in support of the civil revision obviously being unexceptionable, no justification is made out for interference by this Court.

4. Leave to appeal is, therefore, refused.

5. M.Y.H./M‑98/S Petition dismissed.