KHAN Versus ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER. REVENUE, MULTAN Fazal Miran Chauhan, Advocate Supreme Court & Zaki ud Din Pal, Senior Advocate Supreme Court and Mushtaq Ahmad Khan, Advocate Supreme instructed by S. Abul Aasim Jafri, Advocate on Record & Iqbal Ahmad Malik, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by M. Aslam Chaudhry Advocate on Record & Malik A.R. Arshad, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by S. Wajid Hussain, Advocate on Record , MA. Qadri, Advocate on Record

1. MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J. ‑‑These petitions for leave to appeal have been filed by pre-emptors in separate cases. According to their learned counsel,‑none of them has so far been able‑to succeed in obtaining a pre‑ A emption decree till 31‑7‑1986 when the .judgment of this Court in the case of Malik Said Kamal Shah (P L D 1986 S C. 360) came into effect. That being so as held by this Court in the case of Sardar Ali and others v. Muhammad Ali and others P L D 1988 S C 287, no decree can now be passed in favour of the petitioners/pre‑emptors. Leave to appeal in these petitions is, therefore, refused.

2. M.I./K‑74/S Petitions dismissed.