NAZIR AHMAD Versus BOOTA

1. MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J. ‑‑Leave to appeal has been sought by the plaintiffs' side in a land inheritance case, against the dismissal of their Civil Revision by the High Court.

2. The petitioners' plea that Mst.lrshad Begum respondent No.3 was not the daughter of Fatoo, the last male‑holder, has not been accepted by the appeal Court nor by the High Court. ‑‑Accordingly, she was allowed her share of inheritance from her father (Fatoo) in accordance with Muslim Law.

3. Learned counsel has contended that the findings of fact regarding paternity of Mst. Irshad Begum are not correct. The points raised by him relate to appreciation of evidence. The concurrent findings of fact reached by the two higher Courts do not suffer from any infirmity, on the question of fact raised by the learned counsel. Thus, no justification has been made out for interference. Leave to appeal is refused.

4. M.I./N‑100/S Petition dismissed.