Pakistan Case Law
1997 SCMR 412

MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE Versus STATE

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation1997 SCMR 412
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Judge(s)Ajmal Mian, Saleem Akhtar and Mukhtar Ahmed Junejo

MUKHTAR AHMED JUNEJO, J. ‑‑‑Petitioner Muhammad Rafique is accused in a criminal case registered under F.I.R. No.176/84 at Police Station Frere, District Karachi South, on 26‑10‑1994 on complaint of Muhammad Iqbal owner of Delight Auto Service Station. The petitioner was arrested on 28‑1‑1995 and the case against him is pending in the Court of IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Karachi South, where he moved for bail but his application was dismissed on 2‑7‑1995. The petitioner took the matter to the High Court in Criminal Bail Application No.882/95 which was dismissed on 20‑8‑1995 under a judgment against which leave to appeal is sought.

2. Sardar Muhammad Ishaque, learned counsel for the petitioner argued that name of the petitioner does not appear in the F.I.R., where it was alleged that on 26‑10‑1994 at 5.40 p.m. four persons came by car to the Delight Auto Service Station and two persons hit complainant Muhammad Iqbal with TT pistols and robbed him of Rs.70,500. It was further argued that identification test of the petitioner was riot held through eye‑witnesses Muhammad Iqbal and Sher Afgan and that both the Mashirs in whose presence the petitioner produced some cash were police officers and lastly that the petitioner was in custody for the last one year.

3. Mr. S. Zawwar Hussain Jafri, learned Assistant Advocate‑General, Sindh opposed the petitioner and contended that there were about ten criminal cases in which the petitioner was accused of having committed robbery.

4. Fact that the petitioner is accused in a number of cases of robbery, is not sufficient to deprive him of his liberty. It has not come on record, as to, why identification test of the petitioner through eye‑witnesses was not held when his name did not appear in the F.I.R. Mere production by the petitioner before police of some cash alleged to have been obtained by robbery, in absence of any other evidence. In this respect the observations made in the case of Ishaq Masih v. The State (1993 SCMR 1322) are relevant.

5. In the circumstances, we convert this petition into appeal' and grant bail to appellant Muhammad Rafique in the sum of Rs.50,000 with R.R. bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court.

N.H.Q./M‑3295/S Bail granted.

Cited by 39 cases

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.