FASIHUDDIN SIDDIQUI Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN
ORDER
MAMOON KAZI, J.‑‑‑ This judgment disposes of Civil Petitions Nos. 677 of 1996, 678 of 1996, 679 of 1996, 680 of 1996, 681 of 1996, 682 of 1996, 683 of 1996 and 684 of 1996.
2. The petitioners were working as Superintendents in Pay Scale B‑16 in Pakistan Postal Services Corporation. A seniority list, vide Memorandum dated 13‑5‑1996, was issued by respondent No. 2, wherein the petitioners were shown junior to the private respondents. The petitioners, after exhausting their departmental remedies, filed their respective appeals before the Service Tribunal, which were dismissed, and hence the present petitions, for leave to appeal.
3. The Tribunal, vide its common judgment, dated 5‑9‑1996, came to a conclusion that the said seniority list was issued in pursuance of the earlier directions of the Tribunal, which was in consonance with the view taken by this Court in Muhammad Yousuf's case (1996 SCMR 1279), wherein the question of inter se seniority vis‑a‑vis direct recruits and departmental promotees had been settled. The Tribunal also referred to its own judgment in the case of Muhammad Boota Appeal No. 124(R) of 1993). The Tribunal, on the basis of the said judgments, came to a conclusion that the seniority in the case of the petitioners had been rightly determined by the said respondent.
4. Perusal of the judgment of the Tribunal indicates that the Tribunal has decided the case of the petitioners in accordance with the view taken by this Court in Muhammad Yousuf v. Abdul Rasheed (supra). The question in regard to inter se seniority between the promotees and direct appointees was to be determined in accordance with the guide‑lines provided in the said judgment. No such ground appears to have been urged on behalf of the petitioners before the Tribunal indicating that the rule laid down by the said judgment of this Court had not been followed in the petitioners' , case. Therefore, the appeals were dismissed by the Tribunal.
5. Since no infirmity can be found in the judgment of the Tribunal, leave is refused.
A.A./F‑14/S Leave refused.
Cited by 6 cases
- Mir Karam Ali Khan & 28 others vs Province of SIndh and Others 2022 SHC 198
- DIRECTOR-GENERAL INTELLIGENCE BUREAU, ISLAMABAD and others vs AMIR 2010 PLC (C.S.) 946
- DEEDAR HUSSAIN JAKHRANI and others vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Establishment and others 2011 PLC (C.S.) 203
- DIRECTOR-GENERAL INTELLIGENCE BUREAU, ISLAMABAD and others vs AMIR 2011 SCMR 389
- Bashir Ahmed Badini, D&SJ, Dera Allah Yar and others vs Hon'ble Chairman 2022 SCMR 448, 2022 PSC 1448, 2022 PLC (C.S.) 610
- MUHAMMAD RASHID Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2000 SCMR 1297