RAB NAWAZ Versus State Muhammad Zaman Bhatti

ORDER

It is, inter alia, contended by Mr. Muhammad Zaman Bhatti, learned Advocate Supreme Court on behalf of petitioner that on the basis of vague and sketchy evidence no conviction could have been awarded. It is also submitted that the evidence which has come on record has not been appreciated in its true perspective. In order to substantiate his view point the learned counsel has referred the statement of Khawas Khan (P.W.17) which according to him has been ignored by the court below.

2. We have also perused the statement of Khawas Khan (P.W.17) which relates to the factum of recovery which has not been properly appreciated. On the other hand learned DPG has submitted that prosecution has established the guilt to the hilt and no interference is called for in the judgment impugned which is strictly in accordance with taw and settled norms of justice.

3. Be as it may, we are inclined to grant leave on the points mentioned hereinabove as it would be in the interest of safe administration of justice.

H.B.T./R-4/SC Leave granted.