1982 PCRLJ 27
MUHAMMAD YOUSUF Versus THE STATE
The allegation against .the petitioner is that he was armed with hatchet and it is with this that he inflicted a blow on the leg of the deceas ed. Learned counsel for the petitioner laid great stress on the fact than the injuries found on the leg were not incised wounds and it is not the pro secution case that the hatchet was used with the blunt side.
2. Learned State Counsel has not been able to give any satisfactory reply to this argument. Hence, the petitioner is admitted to bail in the sum of Rs. 50,000 (rupees fifty thousand only) with one surety in the lik amount to the satisfaction of A, C., Gujranwala.
Bail granted.
Cited by 1 case
- RASHID AHMAD and 2 others vs THE STATE 1996 P Cr. L J 1497