AHMAD Versus STATE

ORDER

Ahmad petitioner and his brother Muhammad allegedly committed rape on Mst. Naziran, complainant (allegedly a virgin girl) in the morning of 11th June, 1983 in the vicinity of Chak No.15, District Sahiwal, while seven other persons, close relatives of the petitioner, kept guard outside the room where Mst. Naziran was being raped. The case was registered the next day after the prosecutrix was got medically examined privately. Having remained unsuccessful before the Additional Sessions Judge, Sahiwal, the petitioner has approached this Court for the grant of bail.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as for the State and also perused the record produced by S. Bashir Ahmad of Police Station Harrapa.

3. It is admitted that during the investigation seven out of nine accused named in the F.I.R. were declared innocent so much that Muhammad, brother of the petitioner, against whom also there was an allegation of committing rape, was found innocent. Ultimately, the petitioner and Zahoor, co-accused, have been challaned. The case is now pending in the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Sahiwal.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently contended that the prosecutrix being the star witness in the case has been disbelieved during the investigation qua seven co-accused and, therefore, there is no guarantee that allegation of rape levelled by her against the petitioner, was true. He next contended, that the prosecutrix, no doubt is an unmarried lady but, according to her medical examination, her vagina admitted two fingers easily. This assertion of the learned counsel has not been controverted either by the Investigating Officer or by the learned State counsel.

5. In the circumstances narrated above, that the prosecutrix was a deflowered girl before the alleged day of occurrence and that seven accused persons named by her in the F.I.R. have been found innocent. I am inclined to allow this petition. It is directed that the petitioner be released on bail subject to his furnishing a bond in the sum of Rs.20,000 (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner/ Duty Magistrate, Sahiwal.

M. Y. H. Bail granted