MUHAMMAD SHAFI Versus THE STATE
ORDER
This is an application for grant of bail to Muhammad Shafi petitioner in case under section 302/148/149, P.P.C. registered at Police Station Toba Tek Singh vide F I.R. No.120/1987 dated 26‑8‑1987.
2. The prosecution case is that the petitioner and 4 others in furtherance of their common object caused the death of Abdul Hameed deceased in the area of Chak No.297 G.B. on 26‑8‑1987 at 6‑30 a.m.
As for the petitioner, it has been alleged that he had raised Lalkara and also tried to strangulate Abdul Hameed after he had fallen down on receiving knife injuries at the hands of Muhammad Haneef and Muhammad Akram co‑accused.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegations against the petitioner are that he raised proverbial Lalkara and had also tried to strangulate the deceased whereas the symptoms of strangulation are not borne out from the post‑mortem report, The learned counsel for the State has seriously opposed this application on the ground that the injuries found on the neck of the deceased support the allegations against the petitioner that he had strangulated the deceased.
4. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties with care. I find that the petitioner was empty handed at the time of occurrence; that the external and internal examination of the dead body does not indicate symptoms of strangulation. There was no ligature mark on the neck, the marks produced by the finger and the thumb which are usually found on either side of throat in case of strangulation were not found present and that the lungs and heart were found normal. In this view of the matter, the mere presence of bluish discolouring of 4 cm x 3 cm in front of the right side of neck does not reasonably show that Abdul Hameed was strangulated by the petitioner and that although the petitioner had motive to do away with the deceased, as alleged in the F . I . R . yet he did not come armed to the place of occurrence.
For what has been said above, I feel that a case for grant of bail to the petitioner has been made out. He is, therefore, allowed bail in the sum of Rs.10,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of A . C . /Duty Magistrate, Toba Tek Singh.
S.G.D./M‑740/L Bail allowed.