Pakistan Case Law
1988 PCRLJ 609

KAMAL KHAN Versus THE STATE

โญ Prefer in Google
Citation1988 PCRLJ 609
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Criminal Miscellaneous No. 19/B of 1987
Date1987-01-21
Judge(s)Khizar Hayat
ResultBail granted

ORDER

This is a petition for the grant of bail moved on behalf of Kamal Khan who stands arrested in a case (F.I.R. No. 102, dated 3โ€‘3โ€‘1986) under sections 10 and 16 of Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979, registered at Police Station Dajal, District Rajanpur.

2. Muhammad Shafi reported at the police station on 3โ€‘3โ€‘1986 that 4/5 days ago when he returned home after irrigating his land he found his wife Mst. Hasina missing. The womenfolk of his family told him that she had been taken away by Kamal Khan, petitioner, with connivance of other accused due to his illicit connection with ner. As the accused party promised in a Punchayat to restore his wife to him, therefore, he did not lodge the report promptly. During investigation Mst. Hasina was recovered from the house of Kamal Khan, petitioner, on 25โ€‘6โ€‘1986 and was arrested as accused in the case.

According to the complainant, he married Mat. Hasina in November, 1982 while Kamal Khan, petitioner, claimed that Mst. Hasina contracted marriage with him of her own fee will on 5โ€‘4โ€‘1986 and that he as well as Mst. Hasina by living as husband and wife had committed no offence. It may be mentioned that Mst. Hasina supports the petitioner and she has also filed a suit for jactitation of alleged marriage with the complainant. It may be stated that Mst. Hasina has since been allowed bail in the case but the same privilege has been denied to the petitioner, hence this application.

4. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as for the State and also perused the record.

5. The petitioner is in jail for the last 8 months without trial. Both the parties relied on registered Nakahnamas. The suit for jactitation of marriage filed by Mst. Hasina against the complainant is pending decision. All the coโ€‘accused of the petitioner named in the F.I.R. have also been allowed bail. In the circumstances I find that petitioner is entitled to the grant of bail because of question whether Mst. Hasina is the legally wedded wife of the petitioner or that of the complainant is yet to be determined which would materially affect result of this case. Kamal Khan petitioner, is therefore, directed to be released on bail subject to his furnishing bail-bond in the sum of Rs.20,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of A . C. /Duty Magistrate, Rajanpur.

S . A . l Kโ€‘64/ L Bail granted.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.