MUHAMMAD DIN Versus STATE
ORDER
The petitioner is accused of offence under sections 302, 324/34, P.P.C. vide F.I.R. No. 386, dated 28-8-1993, registered at Police Station Cantt. Sialkot.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner and the State were heard at length in respect of the contentions raised herein. Admittedly, the petitioner was empty handed at the time of the alleged occurrence and is only accused of proverbial Lalkara and is not specifically accused of having A assaulted any one. Furthermore, the petitioner is in the judicial lock-up and is no longer required by the police and he is neither a previous convict nor a hardened criminal.
3. Therefore, the petitioner is hereby allowed bail in the sum of B Rs.50,000 with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the A.C./Duty Magistrate, Ssalkot.
N.H.Q./M-1415/L Bail allowed.
Cited by 3 cases
- MUHAMMAD SAEED vs THE STATE 2005 YLR 1644
- ABDULLAH KHAN and anothers vs THE STATE 2001 P Cr. L J 1679
- BABAR MASIH vs THE STATE 2000 MLD 1487