MUHAMMAD ASHRAF Versus STATE

ORDER

1. Learned Assistant Advocate-General states that the police has got the statement of Mst. Sharifan, the alleged abductee, recorded under section 164, Cr.P.C. wherein she has categorically stated that no one has abducted her, she was married to Abdul Sattar petitioner No.2 eighteen years ago and out of the wedlock, one son and two daughters were born and that she is living with her husband of her own free will and accord and that her father Karam Din has got a false case of abduction and Zina registered against her husband and other petitioners. Learned Assistant Advocate-General states that in view of the afore-referred statement of Mst. Sharifan, police is proceeding to get the case against the petitioner cancelled and in the circumstances, he does not oppose the petitioners' application for pre-arrest bail which is accordingly accepted and the interim bail already allowed to the petitioners vide my order, dated 11-1-1994 is confirmed.

2. N.H.Q./M-1476/L

3. Interim bail confirmed.