Pakistan Case Law
1994 PCRLJ 1820

FAQIR MUHAMMAD Versus SAIFULLAH

โญ Prefer in Google
Citation1994 PCRLJ 1820
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Criminal Miscellaneous No.1784/B of 1994
Date1994-05-24
Judge(s)Khalil-ur-Rehman Ramday
ResultBail allowed

ORDER

1. In an occurrence in which one Bashir had lost his life and his wife Mst. Hajra P.W. had received fire-arm injury on her person, the effective shots had been attributed to Muhammad Akram, Khawar Abbas and Amanat. Seven others were not intended being present alongwith the above-mentioned three assailants at the time of the occurrence. Two of them who had neither entered the room where the above-noted damage had been done nor had they taken A any other part in the occurrence in question except their presence at the place of occurrence have already been bailed out by this Court through an order, dated 19-4-1994 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.1513/B of 1994. The case of the present petitioners is not distinguishable in arty manner from the case of the said Murtaza and Muhammad Boota who already stand released on bail. It is an admitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the complainant party had falsely involved ten members of the accused party who are all closely related to each other. Be that as it may, the case of the petitioners being at par with the case of Muhammad Boota and Murtaza who 8 had already been admitted to bail, the present petitioners are also allowed bail in case F.I.R. No.103, dated 30-5-1993, of Police Station Mannanwala of District Sheikhupura subject to each one of them furnishing security in the sum of Rs.30,000 each with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C./Duty Magistrate, Sheikhupura.

2. N.H.Q./S-482/L Bail allowed.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.