1994 PCRLJ 2210
MTIHAMMAD SHARIF Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE
ORDER
The case against the petitioner is under section 10 of the Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood Ordinance. The S.H.O. has investigated the case and has come to the conclusion that the two eye-witnesses cited in the F.I.R. were not the eye-witnesses and just being relatives cited. They are not supporting the prosecution case.
2. Case diaries have been looked into. The girl of course is unmarried but there is no mark of violence on any part of the body according to the medical report. In any case prima facie it does not seem to be a 1 forcible Zina/rape. In the circumstances, allowed bail in the sum of Rs.50,000 with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court.
N.H.Q./I-108/L Bail allowed.
Cited by 1 case
- QAISER NADEEM Versus STATE 1999 YLR 1714