TAHIR HUSSAIN Versus STATE

ORDER

The learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sahiwal had, on 9-9-1993, dismissed the bail application of the petitioners because of their absence. They had earlier been granted bail before arrest, vide order, dated 7-8-1993. Tahir Hussain claims to be a constable and states that he could not, alongwith his younger brother, Sabir Hussain co-accused, appear in the Court, as on 8-9-1993, the I.-G., Police was on visit to Police Recruits Training Centre at Farooq Abad, and he (Tapir Hussain) was not relieved till noon time on the next day i.e. 9-9-1993.

2. The petitioners are directed to appear on 25-9-1993 before the same learned Additional Sessions Judge, who shall dispose of the petition on merits. However, the petitioners shall not be arrested on each one of them furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs.10,000 with one surety each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the A.C./Duty Magistrate, Sahiwal. A copy of the order may be given to the petitioners Dasti and another shall be conveyed to the Court concerned. The petition need not to be kept pending and stands finally disposed of.

N.H.Q./T-91/L Order accordingly.