Pakistan Case Law
1994 PCRLJ 949

MUHAMMAD JAMROZ KHAN Versus STATE

โญ Prefer in Google
Citation1994 PCRLJ 949
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Criminal Miscellaneous No.250/B of 1994
Date1994-01-22
Judge(s)Sh. Muhammad Zubair

ORDER

I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Law Officer, Mr. Nazir Ahmad Ghazi, A.A.-G.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that there was no F.I.R. registered against Mst. Ashraf Bibi, when the bailiff visited the police station on 17-1-1994, at 6-00 p.m., the recovery was effected from her in the presence of Zahid Khan, S.I. and Khalid Mahmood, A.S.I. who are directly under the control of Atta Muhammad, Inspector the I.O. The I.O. himself being the complainant is debarred from conducting the investigation and that inquiry is being conducted by the D.S.P. Nankana against Zahid Khan, S.I. on the complaint of Mst. Nasim Bibi, petitioner in Criminal Miscellaneous No.37/H of 1994..He further submits that the provisions of sections 52 and 103, Cr.P.C., as well as Police Rules 25.23, 26.3 and 26.18-A, were apparently violated. He also contends that no case has so far been registered against Jamroze Khan petitioner and the police mala fidely wants to arrest him on the statement of his wife, who is an accused in case.F.I.R. No.21/94,

3. The investigation of case F.I.R. No.21/94, registered against Mst. Parveen Bibi, has now been entrusted to the D.S.P. present in Court. He wants time to probe into the matter dispassionately and independently. In the circumstances, the case is adjourned to 6-2-1994. The D.S.P. can register a case against Mst. Ashraf Bibi on the complaint dated 17-1-1994 of Atta Muhammad, Inspector, and investigate both the cases simultaneously.

4. Meanwhile, the D.S.P. is directed not to arrest the petitioners. However, they are directed to join the investigation of the cases as and when required by the D.S.P. If they fail to join the investigation, then the D.S.P. can request for withdrawal of concession of pre-arrest interim bail allowed to them. The petitioners shall appear personally before this Court on the adjourned date and so the D.S.P. A copy of the statement of the Inspector, recorded in the habeas corpus petition may be given to the D.S.P.

N.H.Q./M-1372/L Interim pre-arrest bail allowed

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.